Imagine that: common ground in a collegiate athletics dispute.

On Monday, June 8, the College Sports Commission revealed that it had resolved an Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) dispute with a pair of University of Georgia student-athletes and that a third-party arbitrator had agreed with the amended resolution.

NCAA said no to Brendan Sorsby. A court just said yes. Here’s why

Initially, the CSC — with its NIL Go — had ruled the deals for the two Georgia Bulldogs as outside the allowable range of compensation (ROC).

The matter was then directed toward third-party arbitration, which is one of the three options available to student-athletes if they get a deal that is flagged or rejected for initial approval.

However, the CSC indicated that it routinely updates its model regarding rules of compensation and determined at that time that, based on the new guidelines, the deals for the Georgia athletes should be approved.

The CSC on May 15, 2026, moved to dismiss the arbitration proceeding once it determined the deals met the group's guidelines. The CSC also asked that Georgia's request to recoup legal fees in the arbitration case be denied per original terms of the House Settlement agreement.

While the arbitrator did not terminate the proceeding upon the CSC's request, he did uphold that the CSC would not be obligated to reimburse Georgia's legal fees in the case. He ruled on June 5 that the deals could proceed as submitted after the CSC reevaluated the proposals and determined that they fell within the allowable parameters of NIL Go guidelines.

“As more deals are submitted and cleared," CSC CEO Bryan Seeley said via statement, "we regularly update our dataset to ensure that student-athletes receive the NIL compensation they deserve. We are committed to applying the rules fairly and to continuously refining the tools we use to do so.

"When additional data showed these deals were within range, we acted immediately to clear them.”

The CSC emphasized in its release that it would not make a habit of reviewing previously adjudicated deals under terms of the House Settlement and via its NIL Go platform but stressed an exception in this instance because the case was still in an arbitration proceeding.

Georgia, per the CSC, also had sought broader powers in "institutional questions" of the arbitration process but was denied its request by the arbitrator.

With the resolution of this case and one involving 18 Nebraska football players, the College Sports Commission now has just one unspecified active arbitration remaining from its report on May 7.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: College Sports Commission, Georgia reach NIL deal agreement